Non-Uniform Belief in Expected Utilities in Interval Decision Analysis

نویسندگان

  • Aron Larsson
  • Love Ekenberg
  • Mats Danielson
چکیده

This paper demonstrates that second-order calculations add information about expected utilities when modeling imprecise information in decision models as intervals and employing the principle of maximizing the expected utility. Furthermore, due to the resulting warp in the distribution of belief over the intervals of expected utilities, the conservative Γmaximin decision rule seems to be unnecessarily conservative and pessimistic as the belief in neighborhoods of points near interval boundaries is significantly lower than in neighborhoods near the centre. Due to this, a generalized expected utility is proposed. Introduction In the basic model of Bayesian decision analysis, a decision maker is to choose an alternative/action from a nonempty, finite set A = {A1, . . . , An} of possible alternatives. Each alternative may end up with a finite set of consequences, and the resulting consequence of each alternative depends on the true (but probably unknown) state of nature θ ∈ Θ = {θ1, . . . , θi, . . . , θk}. The corresponding outcome is then evaluated by means of a utility function u satisfying u(A×Θ) → R (A, θ) → u(A, θ) Since the true state of nature is unknown, the model asserts the knowledge of the probability distribution P (.) on (Θ,Po(Θ)). The alternative A to choose is then the alternative which maximizes the expected utility, for all Ai ∈ A. This selection procedure is commonly referred to as the principle of maximizing the expected utility, and is argued for in (von Neumann and Morgenstern 1947) and (Savage 1972), as it is implied from widely accepted axiom systems defining formal models of rationality. Thus, a preference ordering relation on A is implied from the magnitudes of the different alternatives’ expected utility. Definition 1 The principle of maximizing the expected utility is accepted if a decision making agent chooses the alternative A∗, whenever A∗ = argmax A (E(A)) Copyright c © 2005, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. where E(A) = ∑

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Distribution of Expected Utility in Second-order Decision Analysis

In decision analysis maximising the expected utility is an often used approach in choosing the optimal alternative. But when probabilities and utilities are vague or imprecise expected utility is fraught with complications. Studying secondorder effects on decision analysis casts light on the importance of the structure of decision problems, pointing out some pitfalls in decision making and sugg...

متن کامل

A note on article "The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees"

Multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA) problems having both quantitative and qualitative attributes under uncertainty can be modeled using the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. Several types of uncertainties such as ignorance and fuzziness can be modeled in the ER framework. In this paper, the ER approach will be extended to model new types of uncertainties including interval belief degr...

متن کامل

INCOMPLETE INTERVAL-VALUED HESITANT FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS IN DECISION MAKING

In this article, we propose a method to deal with incomplete interval-valuedhesitant fuzzy preference relations. For this purpose, an additivetransitivity inspired technique for interval-valued hesitant fuzzypreference relations is formulated which assists in estimating missingpreferences. First of all, we introduce a condition for decision makersproviding incomplete information. Decision maker...

متن کامل

Decision Making in a Context where Uncertainty is Represented by Belief Functions

A quantified model to represent uncertainty is incomplete if its use in a decision environment is not explained. When belief functions were first introduced to represent quantified uncertainty, no associated decision model was proposed. Since then, it became clear that the belief functions meaning is multiple. The models based on belief functions could be understood as an upper and lower probab...

متن کامل

Distribution of expected utility in decision trees

Evaluation of decision trees in which imprecise information prevails is complicated. Especially when the tree has some depth, i.e. consists of more than one level, the effects of the choice of representation and evaluation procedures are significant. Second-order representation and evaluation may significantly increase a decision-maker’s understanding of a decision situation when handling aggre...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005